Law and Ethics Practice Exam 2026 - Free Practice Questions and Study Guide

In situations where a counselor becomes aware of a potential threat from a third party, it is critical to first assess the validity and context of the threat. Checking with the client allows the counselor to gather more information about the circumstances surrounding the threat. This step is essential, as it enables the counselor to understand whether the threat is based on a misunderstanding, a miscommunication, or if it poses an actual risk.

Engaging the client in dialogue serves multiple purposes: it respects the client's autonomy, encourages open communication, and aids the counselor in determining a proper course of action tailored to the situation. By verifying the details with the client, the counselor can better define the seriousness of the threat, assess the potential risk, and decide on the most appropriate and ethical response, whether that is to report the threat, involve law enforcement, or take other preventive measures.

The other actions provided could lead to premature and potentially unnecessary escalation or mismanagement of the situation. Immediate reporting without understanding the context may not consider the client's perspective, and contacting law enforcement directly might be unwarranted if the threat is not credible. Encouraging the client to silence the third party is not only unethical but could further complicate the situation and undermine the trust in the counselor-client relationship. Hence,